Roulette System Reviews | Page 7

Jafco Pred 7 | Rouletteprediction.com

 

NOT RATED

 

Initially I believed this seller (John) to be merely Mark Howe under a fake name. This may be the case as Mark has many fake names, so I suggest approach with caution. However it may not be the case. I have spoken to the seller via phone at length. Specifically he wanted to assure me he was NOT Mark Howe. After his call, I'm unsure of what the case is - there are points to support both sides of the argument. On one hand there is information that suggests he is Mark, and on the other hand the seller appeared honest and "normal". So I have given him the benefit of the doubt and have removed my claims that he is Mark Howe. So there is no review for this product. I have not been contacted by anyone who has dealt with him. Basically I know nothing about him beyond what is on his web sites. If you ask me what I know about his products, simply at present I know very little about them.

 

Like I told him via phone, unlike Mark Howe or Forester, I am not interested in attacking competition or anyone just to make a few dollars. I am honest with what I say, and care far more about truth, and the welfare of my fellow man than profit.

 

On Forester's website, he claims the Pred7 computer is very poor. But when it comes to the competition, I really would not believe anything Forester has to say, so I advise not relying on content on Forester's website about this device.

 

If anyone has dealt with John, has purchased his products, or has information that would verify the identity of "John", please advise me so this information can be updated.

 

Jafco Pred7 Roulette Computer

 

 

 

 

Don Young Infallible Roulette System | roulettewinner.com

 

 

The Don Young infallible roulette system is $10,000, but does it actually work? No, unless you find a wheel that is so incredibly biased that the ball almost always lands in the same wheel sector.

Part of the theory behind the system is based on the law of a third, which states that after any amount of spins, about a third of them will be repeats. But in no way can this principle be used to formulate a winning roulette strategy. In fact, anyone creating a roulette strategy based on this principle clearly does not understand the science of gaming.

The only part of the method that is potentially valid takes advantage of biased wheels. I don't think Don intended this to be the case though. More specifically, the method relies on you making bets on specific sectors after the ball lands in them numerous times. In other words, the method detects "hot sectors". However, the procedures used by this strategy can only possibly be effective if the bias is extremely strong - to the extent where I don't believe any suitable wheel has ever existed. Put in simpler terms, the system relies on the ball landing in the same sector so frequently that it will almost never happen, unless the wheel is enormously flawed to the extent where it is plainly visible in as few as 10-20 spins. Such wheels simply don't exist in modern casinos, and I doubt they ever existed in the history of roulette.

Additionally, so few spins qualify for bets that application is extremely impractical. In fact, even after an hour or so of observing spins, often only one spin may qualify for a bet. So even if the strategy were effective, it would be far too impractical. Nevertheless, I tested the Don Young infallible roulette system his system against 50,000 real spins from Spielbank Hamburg and on average, bets only qualified once every 50 or so spins. I really wanted to test this system thoroughly and it literally took days, but the end result was -280 units. This is far from an infallible system.

Don Young's guarantee is that his system wins against the Zumma tester book (15,000 real casino spins), which it does. But after testing it over my own set of real spins, I'm convinced his system was "reverse engineered" solely for the 15,000 spins which is something anyone can do.

VERDICT: I find it difficult to believe this is anything but an expensive scam. The method is very poor, and far from infallible. Whether or not Don realizes it, the strategy can be adapted to wheels exhibiting an inconceivably strong bias. For this reason, it received one star. However, realistically, suitable wheels do not exist in modern casinos, and may have never existed.

Don Young

 

 

< Back to Roulette System Review Index

< Back page

Next Page >

 

 

Name: Email: